Yuku free message boards

Wow,

There are so many holes in this farce of a thought process that it is almost unfathomable to ascertain that it was written seriously.

First off the title fight: Yes, Prince Keldar (at the time) fought against Duke Croaker to take the throne from whom you state is the good King. But I guess you missed who actually chose Duke Croaker to fight for him as his champion. Um Yes, it was Good King Tarim who CHOSE Duke Croaker. And if I had been healthy that day he would have chosen me (yet another Mordomian) to fight as his champion, but alas I could not fight for injuries to my hand & shoulder. It's about having the best guy out there and Duke Croaker was the best combatant, that is why King Tarim chose him. BTW: The person most insulted by this post is Duke Croaker. If you even knew ANYTHING about him you would know that he would NEVER throw a fight to Keldar. I do not envy the headaches you will receive at the end of his crushing flail; uh once he discovers who you actually are, that is.

In any event and even after Kedlar defeated Croaker, King Tarim still had the opportunity to thwart Keldar from taking the throne by winning the final round (as are the rules of a Kingship Tourney). So, after Keldar won vs Croaker, Good King Tarim fought against Keldar in a weapon category that The Good King got to choose, himself. So any murmuring about the legitimacy of the title fight should be addressed to Archduke Tarim, not Mordom.

Next: Your own Emperor (Bannor) was one of the Elders of the fight and never said a discordant word throughout the entire event yet you speak as though you know exactly what transpired and that somehow the fight was untoward?

By implying that this match was somehow fixed by Mordom, you are insulting all Mordomians, and specifically the Honor and Integrity of King Keldar & Duke Croaker; despicable!

This simply goes to show how very little Laconians actually understand about Honor and about what is going on around them within the realm. You see through distorted lenses and cannot grasp the geopolitical arena, due to your lack objectivity. This is why you have so many enemies.

You talk about freedoms & injustices, yet you act without proof and make slanderous innuendos. If you wish to truth speak me about why Mordom gave its land away, I would be happy to tell you exactly why we chose to do this. The possibility of a Mordomian King of Darkon was NEVER an issue in our choice to yield our land & assets. The accusation that it was premeditated for this purpose is an absolute insult to the entirety of Mordom. But again, you understand nothing about why Mordom (or any counrty for that matter, even your own) acts the way it does. We (Mordom) act with a purpose, for a reason FOR REASON, which (in and of itself) is beyond the comprehension of any Laconian.

You (Laconia) do not act out of reason, but out of impulsion and without care. You are careless and inconsiderate, thus you will always be thwarted. I am told through the grapevine that you maybe going to war soon. I hope this is true; I should like to see you fail AGAIN. You havent the capacity to win a war because you know nothing about how to do so. Nevertheless, I should love to see you try.

You are a band of honor-less, classless, mindless morons who know nothing about the freedoms to which you speak. You have an Emperor. In your very few years upon this realm you have attacked several countries without provocation, yet you scream down with imperialism? Do you even know what you are screaming?

Imperialism by definition implies an empire having control over another nation, or nations. Mordom hold no lands, neither does His Majesty: King Keldar, thus there is no Empire (ipso facto no Imperialism maybe applied). Now Laconia on the other hand well Im not sure. Do you own lands from any of the wars you have partaken? If not, it is not from lack of trying, but for lack of battle competence lol. So... Either you are an empire, or you are a wannabe empire which is sadder (given your cries against imperialism), I cannot say.

You cry out to people about imperialism beating down democracy, YET YOU HAVE AN EMPORER AND YOUR COUNTRY ATTACKS OTHERS ON A RELATIVELY REGULAR BASIS! You seem to be shouting out words against yourself here; not against Keldar. AND BTW: Mordom was, is and has always been far more Democratic than your farce of a nation. Keldar NEVER had the capacity to force the Landstradt (i.e. Mordom) into ANY action they chose not to partake in. Everything Mordom ever did/does was/is by consensus.

And the word you are looking for (idiot) is Monarchy, not imperialism. Keldar is a King, not an Emperor (like Bannor). He owns no lands thus he cannot be accused of Imperialism and given that he owns no lands, even Monarchy is tough to apply.

You say Keldar is a puppet King do you even know what that term means? A puppet to whom? To Mordom?

Mordom hasnt even had a Lanstradt meeting since the time when we finally decided to yield our lands, so how would Keldar be a puppet to a body that (for all intents and purposes) doesnt have any viewpoints and doesnt meet any more?

I have already written more than I wanted to on the subject and there are many, many other flaws in your argument. Maybe I will take the time to address them, but probably not. I am sure others will see how ridiculous your points are and hopefully they will take up where I left off. Maybe at some point you should think first before you act, but that just wouldnt be the Laconian way, now, would it? You all act first then think about it later and never let reason get in the way of anything you might do. This is yet one more layer of the onion which is Laconia. Keep peeling and you will never find reason in any of it always the same bitter pointless layers.

Sincerely,
Paladin of Kodos,
Prince Malkin Campbell

Member of EOG
Member of the Warriors Guild
Member of the Kings Guard
Hand of The King

Sheesh! Do I have to explain everything to you guys??? (hint: a dictionary is a very helpful tool learn to read and then use one when you write). Before you post words like: Imperialism, Democracy, Slander, and the like maybe you should try to understand their meaning first (note: the proper use of "their"). This is what an intelligent person does. An idiot/moron uses words that he does not fully grasp in posts which are hardly discernable.

To help you out the definition of Slander: a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report

Slander is what you did when you posted about Keldar and implied that Kingship fight was a somehow rigged by Mordom (when it was not) that is a falsehood.

This quote is slanderous:

Quote:

---

Are they all so blind, can they not see the corruption at work. He took the throne from a Good King, in a fight against a member of his own nation, who was then rewarded for his service with title.

---

These quotes are not slanderous:

Quote:

---

Democracies don't have emperors you moron
And the word you are looking for (idiot) is Monarchy, not imperialism

---

Why are they not slanderous? Well for several reasons. First they both happen to be true. Secondly, idiot and moron are subjective expletives, used to address the person to which they apply and to denote mild exasperation at said persons stupidity, which is hardly arguable given the context. The words (in and of themselves) do not constitute slander because they are subjective remarks (much the same as the term Ugly never mind the fact that they happen to be accurate labels). In order for those remarks to be dubbed slander you would have to prove that they constitute some falsehood pertaining to you I do not believe this can be done, sir, but you are more than welcome to try. As a cleric you have the spell truth-speak. You may ask me (under the influence of said spell), whether or not I actually thought you to be a moron/idiot at the time I addressed you as such I assure you I did (and still do)

And btw, both of my quotes were totally IC I dont believe you actually understand the difference (as Selann noted prior).

Lastly: I think it funny, you posting yes..show your anger in the subject line of your previous missive. I assure you that I am and have been relatively calm throughout this thread so whos getting all bent out of shape?

Richard (chill out for one second):
You need to go back and reread my posts. Think about what in character and out of character truly mean. I dont have a dictionary definition for you so it might take a little effort on your part to think it through. Since you are not use to thinking very hard, please dont hurt yourself. If you find it is all too confusing walk away from the computer for a while, take some deep breaths maybe count to ten, or go watch your cartoons for a bit...in order to get your mind off of things, then come back to it when you are ready.

Rinse and repeat until you finally realize what IC and OOC mean and that it is possible for someones character to insult anothers character within the game of Darkon. (Note: this is what an Out of Character insult looks like)

OK moving on:

Richard,

My remarks pertaining to the name calling (idiot and moron) were all COMPLETELY IN CHARACTER REMARKS.

Malkin addressed Dienekes as an idiot and a moron. It wasnt Gary addressing Richard.

Because Dienekes was the person writing the slanderous missive (very poorly I might addpoke), Malkin attacked Dienekes for his ridiculous assertions. Unfortunately Richard is unclear as to the terms In Character (IC) and Out Of Character (OOC) and what they really mean. This is sad.

Look Richard, Dienekes whoever. It is clear you dont understandwell I dont know if there is anything you actually do understand. But I see no point in continuing this banter.

NOTE RICHARD: THIS WHOLE POST IS OUT OF CHARACTER. Read my previous posts and compare now do you understand the difference?

I am sorry to everyone for the totally OOC post, but I thought that it was necessary... sadly I do not know if it will actually help or not.

Sincerely,
Gary Black